Free Destiny vs. Controlled Fate in Antigone Essay

Fate is an old debated concept. Do ones actions truly play a role in determining ones life? Is fate freedom to some or is it binding to others, in that no individual can make completely individual decisions, and therefore, no one is truly free. Nowadays, fate is a subject often rejected in society, as it is seen as too big, too idealistic, and too hard to wrap a persons head around. However, at the time of Antigone, the concept was a terrifying reality for most people. Fate is the will of the gods, and as is apparent in Antigone, the gods will is not to be questioned. Much of Sophocles work focuses on the struggle between human law and what is believed to be the god’s law. Fate was an unstoppable force and it was assumed that any†¦show more content†¦At some time she thought she must have been wrong, otherwise she would not of have hanged herself if she truly believed the gods were on her side. Antigone’s fate as it seems was unstoppable death. Most people thin k she herself changed her fate, from being killed by lack of food that Creon supplied to her, to taking her life into her hands and committed suicide. It still was the same fate, the way in which Antigone met her fate is the only difference. The curse didnt elude Creon either, despite his royalty. Consider the irony in the following passage: â€Å"CREON. You’ll never marry her while she lives. HAIMON. Then she must die. But her death will cause another. CREON. Another? Have you lost your senses? Is this an open threat?† (3.118-121)The gods must have robbed him of his common sense, because Haimon was trying to tell his father that he would commit suicide if he killed Antigone. Creon would not listen. He put his family on the backburner and forever burdened one of his dead nephews and Antigone, all because of his pride and his greed for power. That pride and hotheadedness turned into a big problem, as he would have preferred to, â€Å"End his life and die than live with the agony of his mistakes† (Exodos134-138). In Creon case his fate was caused again and again crossing the line between laws set by the gods and the laws set by man. Despite whom readers of Sophocles Antigone

Domestic Violence A Serious And Grave Social Concern

Domestic violence is a serious and grave social concern. Domestic violence essentially affects everyone. It is not merely a personal or private problem in families. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a woman is beaten every 15 seconds somewhere in the United States. (www.bjs.gov). According to the AARDVARC 960,000 incidents of violence against a current or former spouse, boyfriend, or girlfriend each year to 4 million women who are physically abused by their husbands or live-in partners each year. (AARDVARC.org) The National Domestic Violence Hotline has received more than 700,000 calls for assistance since 1996. (National Domestic Violence Hotline.) There are many different forms of domestic violence from mild to severe forms of abuse with mild forms occurring more often than severe abuse. Mild abuse includes pushing, grabbing shoving, or slapping a woman. More severe abuse includes kicking, choking, beating or using a weapon on them although physical abuse may be the most visible sign of violence, the emotional state of the victim often is much more complex. Abuse is the establishment of control and fear n a relationship thorough violent acts. The abuser uses acts of violence and series of behaviors, including intimidation, threats, psychological abuse and isolation to control women. Domestic violence has many effects on society and families. Each year, medical expenses form domestic violence total at least $3 to $5 billion. Businesses forfeit another $100Show MoreRelatedDomestic Violence(Dv) Is A Serious And Grave Concern, Not1617 Words   |  7 PagesDomestic violence(DV) is a serious and grave concern, not only in the Unit ed States but also around the world. It occurs when an intimate partner expends control and sovereignty through physical, mental, sexual and emotional abuse thereby resulting in physical and psychological trauma of the victim. There has been an alarming increase in the occurrence of DV in social media and literary work being produced today and this has resulted in it getting a lot of attention. According to population surveysRead MoreDomestic Violence And The Legal Ramifications Of The United States1992 Words   |  8 Pages ABSTRACT: Domestic violence essentially affects everyone. It is not merely a personal or private problem within families. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (US Department of Justice), a woman is beaten every 15 seconds somewhere in the United States. Additionally, the Surgeon General s report also reveals that one in five women victimized by their spouses or ex-spouses say that they had been victimized over and over Read MoreDomestic Violence Against Women1829 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿Domestic Violence against Women as a Grave Threat to Society Domestic violence, or intimate partner violence as it is also referred, is a serious problem in today’s society. This paper will focus on physical violence and abuse against women, though other types of abuse exist. Despite new and emerging laws, advocates speaking out, and a slight decrease in overall reported domestic violence incidents, women are still victims. There are adverse effects to prolonged and/or severe abuse, not the leastRead MoreDomestic Violence And Child Protection Essay1599 Words   |  7 Pagespolicy direction was necessary in the broad sense, its application to family law raises serious questions of justice, family law policy and individual rights. This essay will analyse the potential effects of the Family Court Reforms on the functionality of the Family Court. Analysis will principally focus on two areas of family law which are perhaps the most in need of legalistic protection: domestic violence and child protection matters. Before analysing the reforms as implemented, it is necessaryRead MoreEssay on Conflict and Impact on Gender2361 Words   |  10 Pagesspecific impacts as well, although it is women who are mostly affected by conflict as they are affected in several more different ways than men, and at a higher intensity in most cases. In certain parts of the world, women face deliberate gender based violence and discrimination. Women are affected by conflict during the time it takes place as well as in the post conflict period. It is during the post conflict period that these impacts are gravely felt. During conflict time women are direct victims ofRead MoreDomestic Violence Against Women Act Of 19943515 Words   |  15 Pages Domestic Violence Health Policy Yuliet Pozo Martinez South University â€Æ' Abstract Despite the fact the physical effects of domestic violence could be the similar as for other forms of violent crime, the emotional effects can be much worse. Domestic violence happens when a crime is committed against a victim by someone with whom the victim is or has previously found, in a close relationship or somebody living in the same household as the victim. Domestic violence regulations differ fromRead MoreImportance Of Practising Christians Who Do Not Think A Lot About The Foundations Of Their Faith1570 Words   |  7 Pages(CCC 1324). There are numerous reasons why Christians do not think a lot about their foundations of their faith. Some of these reasons may include fear; a lack of compassion and passion from other Church-goers; the influence of culture, media and social media; a lack of education; a feeling of being unequipped to evangelize; not strong in faith; a lack of religious leadership. These are some examples why many Christians have a weak foundation in God and his Son Jesus. During the papacy of Pope PiusRead MoreThe Reform On Homicide And Justice Act 20092666 Words   |  11 Pagespartial defence are justificatory approach and excusatory approach. In CJA the emphasis moves from ‘compassionate excuse’ in the Homicide Act 1957 to ‘imperfect justification’. According to the justificatory approach, a killing in anger produced by serious wrongdoing is ethically less wicked and deserves a lesser punishment. Such a shift in legal rationale pushes defence up the scale . It is no l onger enough that D feels wronged, he must have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged to triggerRead MoreAmerica s Criminal Justice System1845 Words   |  8 Pagesensure that if given a second chance the criminal will not offend again. We need to confront crime with a proper punishment and that is where retribution comes in. With retribution society appears more secure and crimes of violence decrease. Since it is essential to control violence in society, retribution is essential. Retribution should undoubtedly be favored over rehabilitation in America’s criminal justice system because it enforces the law and ensures justice. Newman as a punishment for crime Read MoreThe Impact of Domestic Violence Against Women in Tanzania5091 Words   |  21 PagesContext of the Problem Womens violence is a main problem in Tanzania and this paper will describe, possible impact brought by domestic violence to women of Tanzania. Women experience the violation such as raping, beating, threats and involuntary prostitution. Few years ago woman violation was not a major issue in the society, and this is because of the social approach towards women, where by men were given more priorities in the system of education and labor force in the society than women

Pros and Cons of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Section 18c)

Question: Discuss about the Pros and Cons of the Racial Discrimination ? Answer: Introduction Section 18 of the Australian Racial Discrimination Act 1975 details about the provisions with regards any kind of behaviour which is odious in nature due to race, colour or national or ethnic origin in Australia. The said section came into effect during the Whitlam Government which states that the racial discrimination is illegitimate in Australia. However the said section is a debatable one, due to the various pros and cons it has. Section 18C states that any act is considered to be illegal in the public if the said act is reasonably and in all possible stances will affront or abuse or disgrace or threaten another individual or a group of such individuals and if the said action is done because of race, caste, national or ethnic origin of those being the victim. Cons Of Section 18c Section 18 in its present edifice offers a practical and an eminent stage or else difficult to understand and hateful tones by depicting the unmerited notice of the media as in the case of Jones v Toben (2002). During an interview with ABCs Damien Carrick, Adrienne Stone had said that even though he is ready to consider the fact that the anti- disparagement laws are not essentially in contrast to the freedom of expression, yet there seems to be an actual risk of counterproductive self overpower effects. Specifically due to the said reason, Toben was given a decades chase in the courts, which is an international platform wherein they can narrate their view points and thus enable to change oneself from a person who was basically engaged in the oppression of a religious community to an individual who considered oneself as a sufferer of such a disadvantageous stature. The said problem has lead to the development of the next pros. The section in its present state twists objectives of this type of legislation into supposed willing victims for freedom of speech. It has been correctly understood that if a person is not careful, the media will ensure that a person detests the people who are suffering the brunt of oppression and their attitudes will become pro the oppressors. Such a misrepresentation in thinking would lead people to perceive the things in a manner which is illogical and often is increased by turning oppressors into the perceived martyrs and those who are being oppressed into apparent oppressors (Sherlock, 2017). Many think that categorizing such actions of an individual against another into the heading of illegitimate is a stupidity. The law passed is too broad in nature but the bar it sets is not up to the mark. The said act is defined as inadequate as it states that the trigger for section 18C should not happen if a speech merely offends or insults another individual. Thus inclusion of such words makes it very easy for anyone to file a suit against another person. The feeling of insult should not be reason enough to put restrictions on freedom of ones speech. The section is framed in such a manner that it puts legal obligations as well as punishments for such issues which are far from being considered as serious (Holmes, 2014). Thus it does not refer to any such speech which can cause hatred and concentrates upon petty issues. Therefore it is not written down in a manner to deal with to the point notions. Thus one can say that the said Section is not consistent under the Australian Constitution. Therefore it is considered to be one of the major threats to the freedom of speech of Australians thereby not paying heed to the other restrictions that exists. Thus due to these restrictions it calls for repealing of the said section as it entirely prohibits the freedom of speech as one is unable to talk about the actual issues such as tax related matters, terrorism or Islam. Further it says that Australias Grand Mufti has demanded for safeguarding the interest of the Muslims similar to the other ethnic groups. Thus the law also demands for inclusion of Muslims protection as well. The ethnic origin has been interpreted as to take into account safeguarding the Jewish and Sikh people but does not specify anything about Muslims. The act can take into account claims of racial detestation construed by the Muslim community. Thus if a person says that he or she had to face hate speeches because they belong to the Muslim community which is beyond their employment status, then their issues are not dealt with by the said Section of the Act (Lewis, 2017). Advantages of Dection 18c However the said section does not only have disadvantages to it, but also has certain advantages attached to it which cannot be ignored. There were times in the past when there existed no law with regards how a person would talk to someone else and would not behold to any unacceptable speech given but was simply considered as personal opinion of a person. But fortunately the same had undergone a change with the advent of Section 18C. The past four decades has stated that it is no longer acceptable to discriminate and distinguish people basis their race. As per this Section, individuals are allowed to articulate their views about the benefits of racial criticism laws, however while analysing these claims and calls for curtailment of two things should be adhered to i.e. around 88 percent of the people who voted in the Fairfax-Nielson poll in the year 2014 stated that people should not be allowed to malign other basis their race, ethnicity and national origin. Secondly, it is blurred as to what does section 18C permit a person to behave like in public (McNamara, 2016). Further to this the section has undergone certain changes over the years which make it more favourable serving the main crux behind implementation of the same. It would be unjust to read section 18C without considering section 18D. The said portion is often forgotten while discussing Section 18C. The political cartoonist are taking the advantage of this flexibility and therefore pushing its limits for decades now. Some individuals are of the opinion that tolerating impoliteness or incivility is a stand of democracy. As per the arguments put forward by Kath Gelber, a social structure has all rights to embrace the basic values at the heart of the democratic ideal of free speech. The same also takes into consideration the freedom to express opinion and the advantage of expressing the opinion in a manner which does not give rise to any such debate in the public. The changes in Section 18 which has deleted the word offend and insult and replaced the same with vilify and intimidation makes it more particular thus setting high level for the said section. The said changes would ensure that the law does not punish such crimes which are not very serious in nature (Doig 2016),. A survey conducted by academics at the University of Western Sydney has found out that 80 percent of the Australians are in support of the new regime wherein it concerns about the protection of racial vilification. This shows that the Australians are highly tolerant towards racism. It clearly shows that the people of Australia understand the importance of dwelling in a society that denounces racism and also finds it correct that the laws reflect the value of the people of Australia. It is the law which helps to regulate and streamline the aspects of the society then why should not a law be formed which would help deny and prohibit abuse and harassment that goes against protecting the dignity of the oppressed person. The said Act gives a definition to the laws that Australia is such a continent wher e people are seen equally irrespective of the race thus promoting racial accord. The said amendment in Section 18C has helped to set a stage for the multi cultural community thus enabling zipping of the hatred towards various race found in the bud. The advantage of the said section is that it has helped to balance the freedom of speech and freedom from cultural denigration (Soutphommasane, 2014). Therefore the Section now focuses upon protecting severe and graver issues than the past. Conclusion Thus on a concluding note it is understood that in view of looking towards the previous Section 18C, the changes have been encouraged and accepted wilfully. While applying Section 18C, courts have started to emphasise only on graver crimes and issues rather than wasting time on lighter ones. Due to this less than 3 percent of the racial hatred complaints ever make it to the courts. References: Doig,M., (2016), Free Speech and 18C: A Rationalists Perspective On A Way Forward, Available at https://newmatilda.com/2016/08/23/free-speech-and-18c-a-rationalists-perspective-on-a-way-forward/ (Accessed 28th April 2017) Holmes,J., (2014), Racial Discrimination Act amendments are either stupid or shameful, Available at https://www.smh.com.au/comment/racial-discrimination-act-amendments-are-either-stupid-or-shameful-20140421-zqxlw.html (Accessed 28th April 2017) Lewis,R., (2017), Grand Mufti seeks racial Discrimination Act cover for Muslims, The Weekend Australian, (Online), Available at https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/grand-mufti-seeks-racial-discrimination-act-cover-for-muslims/news-story/cf45cf93b9a10ae3be431736f2ccd984 (Accessed 28th April 2017) McNamara,L., (2016), Section 18C is an important part of a civilised society and no threat to free speech, Available at https://theconversation.com/section-18c-is-an-important-part-of-a-civilised-society-and-no-threat-to-free-speech-64801 (Accessed 28th April 2017) Sherlock,M.A., (2017), S.18C, Racial Discrimination Act 1975: Free Speech vs Offend and Insult, Available at https://michaelsherlockauthor.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/s-18c-racial-discrimination-act-1975-free-speech-vs-offend-and-insult/ (Accessed 28th April 2017) Soutphommasane,T., (2014), No case for changing race laws, Available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-29/soutphommasane-no-case-for-changing-race-laws/5417076 (Accessed 28th April 20